Skip to content

Some more on peer review and how to know what to read.

May 19, 2012

Brian Earp Twittered this Practical Ethics commentary on Peer-Review this morning, which in part was discussing this proposal for updating how we rate papers.  The issue is not necessarily so much peer review as it is for us researchers to have a reasonable heuristic for determining which research is worth our time, and which is not.

The sheer volume of research is, of course, another issue to consider.

Advertisements

From → Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: